Every year, roughly 37 people die in drunk driving crashes in the United States every single day. For your law firm, those cases represent some of the highest-value personal injury matters you will ever handle. But only if whoever picks up the phone knows exactly what to ask.
Drunk driving accident intake is not the same as standard car accident intake. The liability picture is cleaner, the damages are often higher, and criminal proceedings run parallel to your civil case. Miss the right questions on that first call and you either reject a million-dollar case or sign a client you cannot actually serve.
This guide covers what to capture on every drunk driving accident intake call, which signals indicate a strong case, and the questions that separate the qualifying leads from the ones to decline.
Before your team starts taking these calls, they need to understand what makes DUI crash victim cases distinct from a standard fender bender.
The at-fault driver faces criminal DUI charges, which means police reports, blood alcohol content (BAC) tests, field sobriety results, and potentially criminal convictions are all on record or will be shortly. That evidence is essentially free discovery for your civil case. Whoever takes the call should always ask whether law enforcement was on scene and whether the driver was arrested.
Standard car accident cases rarely involve punitive damages. Drunk driving cases frequently do. When the defendant’s conduct rises to the level of reckless disregard for human life (which DUI typically satisfies), courts have awarded punitive damages on top of compensatory damages. That changes the case value math significantly, and your intake team should flag this potential for attorneys from the very first call.
Defense counsel for DUI defendants knows the liability exposure. Carriers often move faster toward settlement when the BAC is well above the legal limit and injuries are documented. A clean intake that captures the right details gives your firm leverage from day one.
Dram shop liability means that if the at-fault driver was served at a bar, restaurant, or private event, additional defendants may be available. Capturing where the driver was drinking before the accident is not a casual detail. It is a potential second defendant and, in some cases, a second insurance policy.
Date, time, and location are foundational. Time of day matters. A crash at 2:30 AM on a Saturday carries different context than one at noon on a Tuesday. Note both and capture the county, because jurisdiction matters for dram shop laws and venue selection.
This is your first qualifying question. If the answer is yes, you have law enforcement establishing liability on record. Get the officer’s name and badge number if the caller knows it. If the driver fled the scene, note that separately. Hit-and-run DUI cases are still viable but require additional investigation.
A BAC above 0.15 (nearly double the legal limit) is a strong signal for punitive damages in most jurisdictions. Ask whether the caller knows the BAC result from the blood or breath test. Even if they do not know the number, the question tells you whether law enforcement ran a test, which you can later obtain through discovery.
Independent witnesses who saw the driver’s behavior before the crash, or who witnessed the impact itself, are valuable. Get names and phone numbers if the caller has them. If police took witness statements at the scene, that information will be in the report.
This is your damages qualifier. Get specifics. Did they go to the hospital? By ambulance or their own vehicle? Were they admitted or treated and released? Have they seen any specialists since? Ambulance transport and ER admissions are strong signals. A caller who says they have some soreness but has not seen a doctor is a yellow flag.
Establish whether medical records are being generated. Cases with documented treatment from the date of the accident forward are significantly stronger than cases with gaps in care. Also ask whether their auto policy includes MedPay coverage, which pays medical bills regardless of fault and is available on many standard policies.
Ask whether the driver has been charged, whether there is a court date set, and whether they are represented by counsel. If charges are pending or a conviction is in, that evidence is available for use in the civil proceeding.
If yes, find out what was said and whether they gave a recorded statement. Insurance adjusters often contact accident victims within 48 hours specifically to collect recorded statements while the caller is still disoriented. If a statement was given or any payment accepted, your attorney needs to know before signing the case.
Multiple injured passengers can complicate representation conflicts but also signals higher total damages. Ask whether any other passengers were injured and whether they have their own counsel.
This is the dram shop question, asked conversationally. Something like: “Do you know where the other driver had been before the crash? A bar, a restaurant, a private party?” If the answer is a licensed establishment that served them to the point of intoxication, you have a second potential defendant. In states with strong dram shop statutes, that second defendant can dramatically increase total recovery.
Severe vehicle damage (total loss, heavy structural damage) correlates with serious bodily injury and strengthens the damages narrative. Minimal property damage with claimed severe injuries raises questions. Get a general description of what happened to both vehicles.
Ask whether other attorneys, adjusters, or anyone from the at-fault driver’s side has reached out. This tells you whether the caller has already been coached, whether competing firms are in the picture, and whether anything has been said that could complicate representation.
Triage your DUI crash calls based on the signals collected. These combinations indicate a high-priority case:
When you see three or more of these factors together, your next step should be an attorney call within 24 hours, not a five-day callback queue.
Understanding what good intake conversion looks like at a benchmark level helps your team recognize when a DUI call deserves escalation instead of a standard intake workflow.
These are not automatic declines but require the attorney to assess before signing:
Late-presenting caller. If they are calling six months or a year after the accident with no prior legal representation and sparse documented treatment, the case is weakened. Ask why they waited and document the answer.
Recorded statement already given. Not fatal, but you need to know what was said before committing. Adjusters are trained to get callers to minimize injuries. Get a copy before the attorney consultation.
Minimal or disputed property damage. Low-speed impacts with catastrophic injury claims are not impossible, but defense teams will challenge them aggressively. Note the discrepancy and flag it.
Prior similar injuries. Ask whether the caller has had prior accidents or injuries to the same body areas. This is not a reason to decline the case, but it shapes the damages argument and defense strategy.
Gaps in treatment. If the caller stopped treating for several months and then resumed, defense counsel will argue the gap proves the injury was not serious. Document when and why the gap occurred.
These signals typically indicate a case not worth taking on without significant additional investigation:
On the last point: comparative negligence rules vary by state. In some jurisdictions, if the plaintiff was also impaired, recovery is reduced proportionally. In others, recovery is barred if the plaintiff bears more than 50% of the fault. Whoever takes the call does not need to know the law, but they should flag the note for attorney review immediately.
The end of the call has one job: prevent the caller from dialing your competitor next.
Do not end with “someone will call you back.” Give a specific time window and a specific next action.
Use a close like this:
“Thank you for sharing all of that with me. Based on what you have described, this is something our attorneys will want to review right away. I am getting this to them now and someone will reach out within [two hours / by end of today]. In the meantime, please do not speak with the other driver’s insurance company again without an attorney present. Can I confirm the best number and time to reach you?”
That last question does two things: it confirms contact info and it signals that the firm is already working on the case. Both increase the likelihood the caller waits for your attorney instead of calling someone else.
Whoever takes the call should never answer “do I have a case?” definitively. The correct response: “Our attorney will give you a proper assessment once they review all the details, which is exactly why we want to get this in front of them today.”
Every DUI crash intake call should generate a record capturing at minimum:
Do not rely on handwritten notes. Whoever picks up the phone should be completing a standardized DUI victim intake form in real time, while the caller is still on the line. The data should be in your intake system before you hang up.
A drunk driving victim case that qualifies strongly at intake can carry a settlement value significantly above a standard car accident matter. Punitive damages, dram shop defendants, documented severe injuries, and clear liability (the driver was arrested and charged) add up fast.
But that value is only recoverable if your intake process captures everything it needs to capture. One missed question about a recorded statement can complicate the case. One failure to ask about dram shop liability means a second defendant walks away without being named.
The cost of a bad intake call in a DUI victim case is not a missed $5,000 matter. It is a missed $500,000 case that your competitor signed the next morning because your person did not ask the right questions.
Strong DUI victim intake starts with whoever answers the phone knowing exactly what to ask. That is not something that happens by accident. It requires a written checklist, training on what the signals mean, and a clear escalation path so high-value cases reach an attorney the same day.
If you want to understand how the best-performing intake teams across the country build these systems, start with what a monthly intake audit actually reveals about where calls are being mishandled and where cases are being lost.
See how eNZeTi works in a real law firm. Book a Free Call Analysis at enzeti.com.
eNZeTi gives your intake coordinators real-time coaching, mid-call, so every conversation moves toward a signed case.
Get Your Free Intake Audit →